Colin Jones, Paris: A History

Haussmannism and  the City  of Modernity
1851-89

The roles of Napoleon III and Haussmann

 

The return  to power of a Bonaparte  in  1848  instigated a reprise of the imperial  themes  and  the  grandiose scale  of  operations which  Napoleon I  had sketched  out for the capital  of his European empire. Even while he was still President of the Republic, Emperor  Napoleon III (as Louis Bonaparte  made himself in I 8 52)  was planning  the revitalization of the nation's  capital.  Legend had it that he had arrived at the Gare du Nord [one of the principal train stations in Paris] in  1848 with a rolled map under his   arm  containing  the future new boulevards  sketched out in coloured pencils. His  seizure of executive power  in 1851-2, which  roused widespread opposition on the streets of Paris,  increased  the resources at his disposal  and  boosted  his ambitions. The  period  up to the overthrow of the Second   Empire   in I870   and   the  establishment  of  the  Third   Republic (1870-I940) was to be characterized by a programme of urban  renewal perhaps as ambitious and  as far-reaching  as any  in western  history. The  result was a Paris which  by the end of the century  had new boundaries, a new con­figuration  and,  in some  respects, a new identity, as the city of modernity.


The Second  Empire  innovated not by building alongside and outside the old centre, but  rather by locating  innovation at the very core of the city almost for the first time, in the heartlands of the radical  sans-culotterie [groups of lower class radicals] which had opposed Louis Bonaparte's rise to power, and indeed had demonstrated against  his 1852 coup d'etat. Perhaps the most striking feature of the transformation  was a new and  more highly integrated  system of straight and broad roadways which tore through the antique fabric of what was already coming to be called le Vieux  Paris ('Old Paris'). Others included the prioritization of circulation  the harmonization  between monuments and means of communication,  the provision of green space and the articulation of an infrastructure which could cope with a larger and more densely occupied site. . . .


The personal influence of Napoleon III on his proclaimed mission of renovation should not be underestimated. Nevertheless, it is difficult  to disentangle his activities from the role also played by Baron Georges-Eugene Haussmann, whom in r853 Napoleon III designated the Prefect of the Seine, and who remained in power until only a few months before Napoleon's own overthrow. The loss of vital documents, notably in the extensive incendiarism of 1871 following the ignominious end of the Second Empire, makes exact adjudication of their respective parts impossible -- as do Napoleon III's tendency to vainglorious self-promotion, and  Haussmann's rhetorical propensity for stressing his own role as mere 'instrument' and 'servant' of his 'master'.  If contemporaries tended to ascribe more credit to Haussmann, this was partly because they found it difficult to imagine that a man like Napoleon could possibly have a profound influence on a city he appeared to know so little. Before 1848 he had never lived in Paris save as a baby and as a fleeting tourist, and as emperor he would on occasion get lost making the simplest of journeys. Haussmann, the 'Alsatian Attila', in contrast, had spent a  happy childhood in the capital before his family had moved to eastern France. It was the name of Haussmann which, moreover, was to endure. The Bonaparte name was execrated throughout the Third Republic, so that it was not 'Napoleonism' but 'Haussmannism' that was recognized as an influence -- a continuing influence-on  the remodeling of the capital.

 

Napoleon III and Haussmann

 

 

 

Paris Before 1863

Colored areas are subject to special tax on all goods brought in