Why you
are doing this assignment?
Writing a history paper requires you to analyze complex and
often ambiguous phenomena, weigh evidence, come to at least a
tentative interpretation, and present your position forcefully
and convincingly to others. These are skills that you are going
to need in countless personal and professional situations across
your entire life, whether or not you ever take another history
course.
But accomplishing all of this is very demanding, and I would
really like to see you succeed in this course. Therefore, before
we get to the final paper that will provide a large part of the
grade for the course, you are going to have a chance to practice
and perfect each of the steps that you will need to do the kind
of thinking and writing that is needed.
We are starting right now.
The Historical Problem that You Will Be Dealing With
Historians are always involved in
understanding how people in previous eras experienced their
world and why their perspectives are often so different from our
own. Our task in this course will be try to understand both how
the lives of Parisians in period from 1850 to 1900 experienced
the world and how they reacted to the great changes
occurring in their society. We will start by looking at one of
the areas in which change was particularly visible in this
period -- the visual arts. Later we will move on to
transformations that were occurring in other areas or Parisian
life, such as the organization of the city, the development of
consumerism, gender roles, and politics.
As soon as look
at the visual arts in this period, we encounter something that
seems very odd. When we look back at late 19th-century Paris from the perspective of the
21st century, we generally
view it as the site of the one of the greatest cultural flowerings in
human history. In particular, the paintings of that period, including
the works of the Impressionists, Van Gogh, and a host of other great
artists, remain highly popular today.
Yet at the
time, many artists and critics and much of the general public viewed the
new experiments in painting with such hostility that, on at least one
occasion, guards had to be posted at exhibitions to protect paintings
from being slashed by enraged visitors. Works, such as this painting by
Monet, were often seen, not only as the product of
untalented artists, but as signs of the decay of all of Western
civilization.
What Do You Need To Do?
Historians
begin to interpret cultural patterns like this by posing questions for
themselves. In developing reasonable answers to these questions, they
develop a better understanding of what was going in earlier epochs.
So here is a question that will help us understand this aspect
of late 19th century Parisian culture and begin our exploration
of other aspects of that period. It takes a large and diffuse
issue -- why was there so much angry resistance to new art forms
in this period -- and narrows the issues into a specific
question that can be answered with some research and systematic
thought.
What might have caused an older,
established, late nineteenth-century, Parisian artist, such as
Jean-Léon Gérôme to reject new trends in French culture?
In your answer, focus on one
painting that he would be likely to recommend for acceptance in
the annual Paris Salon and one that he would reject.
Explain what in his nation's
history, the ideas about art that he soaked up as a youth, and
his professional position that would predispose him to make
these judgments.
|
This is the kind of question that can serve as the basis for a
strong history paper. But for the present, you will not actually
be writing such a paper. Instead, you will be answering a series
of questions that will duplicate steps they are required in
historical research.
It is time now to go back to Canvas and begin working on the
four parts of the PreClass Assignment. There will be links to
the material on our course website that will help you answers
these questions.
|