Day 3 -- What You Need to Do For Today's Presentation
Thoughts on Today's Work As we have seen the forces of political and the cultural conservatism were quite strong in Paris in the mid-19th century. And yet the society was on the verge of major changes. Yesterday we saw how conscious decisions from the top of the power structure created a new physical environment in the city. Today we are looking at change that emerged from below in one area of culture -- specifically the weakening of the hold of the Academy of Arts on the painting being produced by Parisian artists. In popular culture changes are generally attributed to the extraordinary creativity of one or a few individual geniuses. In this case it would be argued that the work of Impressionists such as Manet, Monet, Degas, and Cezanne was so brilliant that they carried the art world into a new era. But, while there is no doubt that the skill of these artists was very important, historians are generally reluctant to see major changes sole in terms of individuals. There are too many examples of figures with great talent, who failed to carry the world with them, when conditions were not right for a major change. Thus, to explain a major cultural shift, like the development of Impressionism, historians look for other factors that may have supported change. In this case historians would pose a series of questions about what else was going on in France in this period that may have contributed to the success of this art movement. Specifically, they might ask:
Each team will prepare a presentation on one of the questions below. Whichever topic you work on, be sure to stay focused on how the material you are reading could contribute to our understanding of the lessening of the power of the French Academy over Parisian culture. To do this, you will probably need to refer back to some of the material on the Academy and some the examples of academic art from Day 1.
|